Crowd Sourced Knowledge: Netflix Prize Won? 06-29-2009
Log in to Netflix and rate a movie you watched on a scale of one to five and Netflix’ computers will try to suggest other titles you’re likely to rank the same way. This algorithmic pairing process has been marketed as a key differentiator between Netflix movie rental service and that of competitors. It’s been touted as an achievement.
For two and a half years, Netflix challenged the public to try and create a better mousetrap. A million dollar prize was dangled as bait for the first person (or team) to create a program capable of beating Netflix’ Cinematch algorithm by a margin of ten percent or better. Nobody succeeded. Developers inched close but couldn’t quite hit the mark. Seven percent, eight percent, nine…but not ten. The so called "Netflix Prize" went unclaimed. Until now, that is.
On Friday, a group created from a combination of four independent teams that had been vying for the prize submitted a solution that they claim resulted in a 10.05% improvement over Netflix’ Cinematch ranking algorithm.

Make us a Technorati Favorite
Subscribe with Bloglines
In the hit or miss world of video games, the last fiscal year was an unequivocal miss for Agoura Hills based THQ. The company came up $431.1m short on a GAAP basis (or lost $101.8m in Non-GAAP terms) when it reported its full year results in May (
As newspapers continue their efforts to squeeze out revenue from their online properties, one of the questions editors are asking is what differentiation they should have between print and dot com. Some argue that online being free; print should offer something special to add value to those paying for delivery. Others counter that the Internet is the industry’s future and to be out in front requires putting richer content there – online where there are no page space restrictions and a bigger audience to capture.
For a top game publisher to abandon a console platform before the midway point in the hardware’s lifecycle is extremely unlikely. Hardware makers and software publishers have a sometimes conflicted but always mutual need for each other’s services. It’s symbiotic; especially once they’re both invested. Even so, the two aren’t above venting frustrations.
In his biography or Rupert Murdoch, “the Man Who Owns the News,” Michael Wolff spoke indirectly of News Corps culture saying “every second working for [Rupert] Murdoch is a second spent thinking about what Murdoch wants.” Outside the realm of News Corps more core news-driven media properties, MySpace seemed to escape some of that oversight these past few years. The company was coasting on a straightening trajectory as an almost unaffiliated entity.
It usually takes a few days or weeks after a product hits the store shelves before there is a public tear-down and reports about its innards (and manufacturing costs). Jumping the gun, and working off “insider sources” instead of an actual look inside, several sites began sketching out the details and performance specs on the 