Report:Yahoo to Reject Microsoft Bid

msft yhoo rejectedJust as the writer’s strike seems poised to end, another complex negotiation may be about to get even more intense.  The Wall Street Journal is reporting Yahoo’s Board of Directors is set to reject Microsoft’s $44.6b takeover offer as soon as Monday.

According to the report which cites a “person familiar with the situation” as its source: Yahoo’s board has concluded from initial discussions that Microsoft’s $31 per share offer “massively undervalues” the company.  They believe the offer is an opportunistic effort to take advantage of recent weakness in the stock market, and Yahoo’s stock price in particular.

In what may be a negotiating ploy aimed at raising the price, the Journal’s source notes that the company is unlikely to consider any offer below $40 a share.  That would raise the deal value by more than $12b to more $56b.

If the report proves accurate, Yahoo’s decision will put Microsoft to a difficult decision.  One choice, to offer a higher price, may make the deal more costly than Microsoft is willing to commit to.   

Additionally, a higher price does not address one of Yahoo’s other apparent concerns: insufficient provisions for regulatory rejection and a related break-up fee. At issue is a scenario where a U.S. or EU regulatory agency rejects a deal the companies agree to.  If that happens, Yahoo’s board believes the exposure of Yahoo’s Intellectual Property to a competitor (Microsoft) and the financial costs of moving forward, could significantly hurt Yahoo’s future operations.  In the interest of shareholders, they want to insure that, price notwithstanding, deal terms such as a regulatory triggered breakup fee are there to provide a financial remedy. 

The numbers for a reverse break-up fee (which is the fee that will be paid by the buyer if a deal falls apart) of this kind would not likely be small.  For perspective, when private equity firms KKR and Texas Pacific struck a deal to buyout power company TXU for $31.8b, the “reverse breakup fee” was $1b.  When credit card processor First Data was acquired for $29b, the reverse breakup fee was $700m (data source: FactSet MergerMetrics). 

At upwards of $44b, Microsoft’s bid for Yahoo could easily have similarly large fees.  Microsoft may not be willing to gamble hundreds of millions of dollars, even potentially more than a billion dollars, on the risks of regulatory approvals.

If a higher price and these kinds of deal terms can’t be agreed upon, one of Microsoft’s alternatives is to escalate their efforts on Wall Street and attempt  to go around the board of directors in a truly hostile takeover could be equally, if not more, costly.    Yahoo’s corporate formation documents include “poison pills” and other anti-takeover measures.   Microsoft would have to gain majority shareholder support and likely elect a new board of directors to break the log jam.

Proceeding without management support could have additional negative consequences too. Tech companies, like Yahoo, rely heavily on their corporate culture and engineering talent for success.   Hostile takeovers, which by definition lack management support, pose a significant risk of damaging that intellectual capital and scarring the heart of the very assets Microsoft is hoping to acquire: Yahoo’s staff.

If the Wall Street Journal’s report is accurate, things could soon get a lot more complicated. 

 

Related Articles
Microsoft’s and Yahoo: A Bid for a New Net Powerhouse
Steve Ballmer’s Letter to Yahoo’s Board
Yahoo Q4 Earnings
Microsoft Q2 Earnings Release
Microsoft TV: The Next Developments
Viacom Shuns DoubleClick, Embraces Microsoft
Microsoft aQuantive Deals Clears Anti-trust
Inside Major Net Advertising Consolidation

Print This Post Print This Post

2 comments

  1. Peter Quinn Feb 9

    I found your site on technorati and read a few of your other posts. Keep up the good work. I just added your RSS feed to my Google News Reader. Looking forward to reading more from you.

    Peter Quinn

  2. Chris Schnabel Feb 10

    Great stuff you are delivering.

    With regard to the Microsoft-Yahoo potential merger, I like millions of others in the “free” (internet) world would like this deal to go away, or have some other white knight, like IBM, come in and either assist Yahoo in getting over their internal issues and back on track, or buy them and keep them as “Yahoo”, similar to what was done with Lotus when IBM bought them. I think Yahoo culturally would be a better fit for IBM than with Microsoft — standards and openness being huge themes coming from IBM over the past five years. And it would be a new revenue stream IBM should consider and get into. Yahoo technologies would certainly complement what they already have, especially in their IM (Sametime) space. Not sure if that have the capital to buy them, but they certainly have the potential to get that capital faster than others would these days.

    With regard to Google, I’m a huge fan (and investor), but don’t want to see them monopolizing either. I’d rather them do what they do best — innovate, and move to different markets. And frankly, I’m not sure why Google doesn’t buy Novell (does Eric Schmidt not remember how great they once were?) and put out an enhanced version of Linux with a competing desktop to Windows.

    I’d love to hear your thoughts on all of this.

    Regards,
    Chris Schnabel

Leave a reply