2008: The Changing Face of Newspapers 12-30-2008
As years end and the holiday cycle takes over, the pace of events downshifts to a crawl. People rest, taking time with friends and family to reflect and recharge. Vacation’s take over, businesses shutter. Business events and politics, pause. Similarly, the news industry reporting on it all, retrenches. In papers and on websites around the world, pages and mastheads usually dotted with zippy headlines and urgent ledes loan space to nostalgic recaps and forward projections; accounts of the year that was and prognostication for the year that will be.
It’s that time of year.
The lists of 2008’s highlights and shortcomings promise to be long. Many will emphasize the historic U.S. elections and the plight of the global economy. There will be talk of Wall Street’s upheaval and the auto industry’s implosion, Madoff’s mess and fortunes lost. There will be assessments of the Mideast, reference to oil and gas and the environment. There will be summaries of mergers and acquisitions, those that succeeded and those that failed, highlight reels and shames, box office booms and busts.
So goes the year end process.
In this fervent generation of lists, hopefully, the news media won’t overlook reviewing itself. History has yet to write the footnotes, but 2008 is a year that could end up standing out as a part of a watershed period in the evolution of print media, a year when Internet news became a more relied upon source than print (according to a recent Pew Internet survey), a time when digitally rooted upheaval may have finally reached such a pinnacle that it will begin to force the transformation of the industry.

Make us a Technorati Favorite
Subscribe with Bloglines
As a retail brand, 
In June of 2007, private equity firm Elevation Partners announced they were
There’s an old saying that says if you owe a bank a thousand dollars they own you but if you owe them a billion, you own them. While the numbers in the saying vary, today, media mogul Sumner Redstone seems to have validated the theory of the adage: if you owe enough, you’re in control.
Over the past year, in an effort to establish exclusive, long term multiple-rights partnerships (so called “360” deals) with select A-list artists, Live Nation has dangled generous advance payments and equity as bait. Some of music’s biggest names bit in to the lure. Madonna, and Jay-Z, Shakira, Nickelback and U2 all signed up. Now, it seems a couple of the deals may have been even more generous than Live Nation intended.
UK Gamemaker SCi Entertainment Group outbid 