Family Affair: Tribune, Cablevision, Dow Jones
The humorist Erma Bombeck once said “You hear a lot of dialogue on the death of the American family. Families aren’t dying. They’re merging into big conglomerates.”
Looking at some of the biggest corporate acquisitions completed (or in the works) so far this year –, and the power of a few families in those transactions (especially those holding alternate classes of shares with special voting rights ) – her sentiment may have been more accurate than she intended.
First there was Tribune Co., the countries 3rd largest newspaper company. It sold to Sam Zell but only after the Chandler family, whose trusts controlled more than 20% of the stock, initiated a strategic review and pushed for its sale.
Now there are two more multi billion dollar sales in discussion, or on the grapevine, where a single family will play a major role:
1. The Offer:
Today, the Wall Street Journal reported News Corp (Fox, MySpace etc) made a friendly offer of approximately $5billion to acquire Dow Jones, the publisher of the Wall Street Journal, Barrons, MarketWatch and owner of other financial-information services. The offer constituted a 67% premium over market value (the stock jumped more than 50% to $56.20 a share.
The deal, even at a premium, could be a valuable addition to News Corps product portfolio. Based on 2006 revenue, the addition would increase News Corp. newspaper and magazine revenue by a $1b/yr to over $6b (approximately 20% gain). The Marketwatch property would also provide another news channel to be added to the new MySpace news offerings. Given the troubled state of the publishing industry, one has to believe that Rupert Murdoch and his team at News Corp see significant value both in combining Dow Jones business news with Fox TV news properties, and also in the online components of the deal (both those already online, and those that could be).
The Family behind the Scenes:
The Bancroft family holds 24.7% of the outstanding shares of Dow Jones. The voting rights of those shares give them control 64.2% of the company. So far, the family has rebuffed the offer. That may be because they aren’t’ interested in selling but that is unlikely. Since 1986 the family has reduced it’s holdings by more than 50%. More likely is the theory that the rejection is gamesmanship to further drive the price. Click to Read More